| 周雨潇,官计,孟宪东,黄月,李璟瑒,胡尹馨.负性生活事件与青少年负性情绪的关系：反刍思维的中介作用及父母参与的调节作用[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2026,(3):282-288.Zhou Yuxiao,Guan Ji,Meng Xiandong,Huang Yue,Li Jingyang,Hu Yinxin,Relationship between negative life events and negative emotions in adolescents： the mediating role of rumination and the moderating role of parental involvement[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2026,(3):282-288 |
| 负性生活事件与青少年负性情绪的关系：反刍思维的中介作用及父母参与的调节作用 |
| Relationship between negative life events and negative emotions in adolescents： the mediating role of rumination and the moderating role of parental involvement |
| 投稿时间：2025-12-29 |
| DOI：10.11886/scjsws20251229001 |
| 中文关键词: 负性生活事件 负性情绪 反刍思维 父母参与 有调节的中介模型 |
| 英文关键词:Negative life events Negative emotions Rumination Parental involvement Moderated mediation model |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 背景 负性情绪是青少年心理健康的重要影响因素。现有研究多关注负性生活事件、反刍思维等因素对青少年负性情绪的影响，较少关注父母参与这一家庭保护作用，四者之间的作用路径及机制尚不明确。目的 探讨青少年负性生活事件与负性情绪的关联机制，重点分析反刍思维的中介效应及父母参与的调节效应，为青少年负性情绪的预防与干预提供参考。方法 采用横断面研究，于2025年6月使用整群随机抽样法，选取四川省凉山彝族自治州某中学共600名在校中学生为研究对象。采用青少年生活事件量表（ASLEC）、反刍思维量表（RRS）、对父母的感知量表（POPS）中的父母参与分量表以及抑郁-焦虑-压力量表中文精简版（DASS-21）进行调查。采用Pearson相关分析检验各量表评分之间的相关性。采用Process 4.1中的模型4和模型7分别检验反刍思维在负性生活事件与青少年负性情绪之间的中介作用以及父母参与的调节作用。结果 共回收有效问卷534份，有效问卷回收率为89.00%。青少年ASLEC评分和RRS评分与DASS-21评分均呈正相关（r=0.580、0.706，P均<0.01），ASLEC评分与RRS评分呈正相关（r=0.583，P<0.01）。反刍思维在负性生活事件与青少年负性情绪之间起部分中介作用，效应值为0.531（95% CI：0.438~0.630），占总效应的55.60%。父母参与在中介模型的前半段起调节作用（β=-0.109，P<0.05）。结论 青少年反刍思维在负性生活事件与负性情绪之间起部分中介作用，父母参与在负性生活事件与反刍思维之间起调节作用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Background Negative emotions are core predictors of adolescent mental health. While existing research has predominantly focused on the impact of risk factors such as negative life events and rumination on adolescents' emotions， the protective role of the family， particularly parental involvement， has received less attention. Consequently， the integrated mechanism connecting negative life events， rumination， parental involvement and negative emotions remains insufficiently clarified.Objective To elucidate the mechanisms linking negative life events to negative emotions in adolescents， and to verify the mediating role of rumination and the moderating role of parental involvement， so as to provide a theoretical basis for relevant prevention and intervention.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in June 2025. A total of 600 adolescents from a middle school in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture， Sichuan Province， were recruited through cluster random sampling. Participants completed the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist （ASLEC）， the Rumination Response Scale （RRS）， parental involvement subscale of the Perception of Parents Scales （POPS）， and the Chinese short version of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale （DASS-21）. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the correlations among all variables. Model 4 and model 7 embedded in Process macro 4.1 were employed to separately test the mediating effect of rumination between negative life events and negative emotions of adolescents， as well as the moderating effect of parental involvement.Results Ultimately， 534 valid questionnaires were obtained， yielding a valid response rate of 89.00%. ASLEC score and RRS score were positively correlated with DASS-21 scores （r=0.580， 0.706， P<0.01）， and ASLEC score was also positively correlated with RRS score （r=0.583， P<0.01）. Rumination acted as a partial mediator between negative life events and negative emotions， with an indirect effect of 0.531 （95% CI： 0.438–0.630）， accounting for 55.60% of the total effect. Parental involvement significantly moderated the first stage of the mediating pathway （β=-0.109， P<0.05）.Conclusion In adolescents， rumination serves as a partial mediator in the relationship between negative life events and negative emotions， and parental involvement further moderates the predictive relationship from negative life events to rumination. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |